A Nightmare on Elm Street 3: Dream Warriors may be one of Freddy’s most beloved outings, but Wes Craven didn’t like the movie; this is why.
A Nightmare on Elm Street 3: Dream Warriors It may be one of the franchise’s most beloved sequels, but franchise creator Wes Craven didn’t like the movie, and for good reason. Launched in 1984, A nightmare on Elm Street put a paranormal spin on the then waning slasher trend, rekindling interest in the subgenre by offering a more surreal, weird and terrifying take on the genre than a slightly veiled one. Hallowe’en imitation.
Like Craven’s later effort Shout would start a trend of meta-slashers in the 1990s, in the mid-80s, the first appearance of the well-cooked and highly mocked dream demon Freddy Krueger revived the slasher subgenre by adding an unearthly angle to the proceedings. Where most masked killer villains just made their way through a host of interchangeable teens, Freddy murdered his victims where no one was safe: in their dreams.
Click the button below to start this article in quick view.
Inevitably, the resounding success of A nightmare on Elm Street led to an immediate series of cash sequels, and equally inevitably, these follow-ups varied wildly in quality. The first sequel, Freddy’s Revenge, was released just a year after the original and turned the clever premise into a more conventional (and surprisingly homoerotic) possession horror. But the second sequel, 1987’s A Nightmare on Elm Street 3: Dream Warriors, saw a team of teenagers band together to end Freddy for good when he began to haunt his dream. Like the last Freddy vs. Jason This threequel featured an engaging cast, the first of Freddy’s now iconic witty phrases, and some impressive special effects. So why wasn’t Craven happy with the final project? His dislike for A Nightmare on Elm Street 3: Dream Warriors it had little to do with the movie itself, and more to do with the fact that it was out of the production process.
Although A Nightmare on Elm Street 3: Dream Warriors is arguably the most popular installment after the original, Craven didn’t like the fact that new director / writing team Chuck Russell and Frank Darabont dropped a lot of Craven’s ideas for the film and didn’t consult it after getting your blessing to make the movie. In fairness to both creators, Craven’s problem was more with production company New Line, which owned the rights to Freddy Krueger, than with Russell or Darabont. The director said of the threequel (via Nightmare at Elm Steet Films):
“I understood that all the time they would ask me about things. They would bring me into the casting and I would have a really creative part in the movie. The reality was that New Line Cinema never contacted me again after having the script. They changed it drastically in some way. The director and a friend of his rewrote it and changed the names of all the characters, and included several key scenes of their own.. “
Unfortunately, Craven’s experience left the horror legend let down by the studio, but the third Nightmare on Elm Street it still ended up being a huge success and helped launch Russell and Darabont’s film careers. Russell would go on to direct the remake of the movie B The drop before graduating in Jim Carrey’s successful vehicle The mask, while Darabont directed the beloved Stephen King adaptation Life imprisonment (before failing the unfairly criticized Jim Carrey The majestic). However, the ever-resourceful Craven found a way to creatively cope with his frustrations around the A Nightmare on Elm Street 3: Dream Warriors experience. His next entry in the series would be the acclaimed 1994 sequel / meta-slasher. New nightmare, which in addition to scaring Freddy again, included many cynical heists in the Hollywood system and studios that produced endless sequels.
Reference-screenrant.com
