Star trek may have been consigned to the original 79 episodes if Paramount had not revived the concept in 1979 with Star Trek: The Movie. Initially conceived as the template for a new series on a new television network, which became Star Trek: The Movie revitalized the franchise with new sets, new and familiar characters, and new special effects.

RELATED: Star Trek: 5 Ways The Movies Are Better Than The Series (& 5 Ways The Series Is Better)

Although the film was a financial success, it has often been criticized for its running time, abstract plot, and slow narrative. Still, the film is not without its merits, having brought the original crew from the Business to the big screen for a whole new adventure.

10 Good: Klingon Makeover

The Klingons attack V'Ger

Star Trek: The Movie it opened with a squadron of ships slowly approaching the perimeter of a large space cloud. These ships were easily recognizable to longtime fans of the series as Klingon battlecruisers, but when the camera cut into the crew inside, what was seen was not in the least recognizable.

RELATED: Star Trek: The 10 Most Influential Klingons, Ranked

As Trekkers have known for a long time, the Klingons from the original series looked basically human. However, these “movie” Klingons had a completely different and more “alien” look, with a prominent, furrowed forehead as the main feature. This revolutionized the appearance of the species for the generation to come.

9 Not good: Starfleet uniforms

Star trek takes place in a future where human beings have solved problems like hunger, poverty, and war and joined a Federation of planets seeking to peacefully explore the galaxy. This future is established several centuries from now, and the time of Captain Kirk’s adventures is the 23rd century.

However, starting from the wide lapels, bushy sideburns, and flared trouser legs, the film sets directly back to the decade in which it was filmed and released, the 1970s. Of course, the decor, the setting and sci-fi costumes always recall the era in which they were produced, and Star trek is no exception, but in this case, it doesn’t do the movie many favors.

8 Good: Spock Character Arc

Spock looks to the sky Vulcan Kholinahr

Few characters in pop culture history reach the popularity accorded to Mr. Spock, the Businessresident scientific officer and second in command. A large part of what made the character so beloved was his strict adherence to the philosophy of Vulcan logic. However, this was problematic for him, as his human half often scratched beneath the surface of that cold, calculating appearance with unbridled emotion.

Reconciling his two halves has always been one of the character’s defining traits. After his failure to achieve Kolinahr, watching him achieve a measure of inner peace by mentally merging with V’Ger was satisfying for fans.

7 Not good: weak villain

The movie

Star trek it has always straddled the line between being a philosophical examination of human nature in the future, and what Gene Roddenberry once called, “a train car to the stars.” The series managed to balance those aspects to perfection, as Captain Kirk pondered or plowed his way through 79 episodes of the original series.

RELATED: Star Trek: TOS: 5 Villains Fans Love To Hate (& 5 They Just Hate)

Part of what makes even a partially successful action-oriented film is a strong villain, who, unfortunately, Star Trek: The Movie did not possess. A hazy cloud that turns out to be a centuries-old NASA probe is actually not convincing enough to hold the audience’s attention for the film’s two-and-a-half hours. Thankfully, the sequel rectified that oversight with a villain who is widely regarded as the best of the big screen villains from the original cast.

6 Good: special effects

For the time and budget, the special effects of the original Star trek The series may have been cutting edge, but they were dated and cheesy-looking even by 1970s standards. Fans of the series wanted more for the big-screen adaptation of their beloved franchise.

RELATED: 15 Amazing Movie Special Effects Still Standing Today

With the technical revolution in effects following Star Wars, Star trek he was finally able to bring his fans top-notch special effects. From floating space stations to Klingon battle squadrons and an incredible take on Starfleet Command, Star Trek: The Movie made the space look sleek and contemporary.

5 It wasn’t good: special effects

Vger Star Trek Motion Picture

As good as the special effects were in some areas, they weren’t as effective in others. As nice as it was to see the debut of the BusinessWith the warp effects, the rainbow trail that came out of the warp gondolas looked too terrestrial for an interstellar vehicle.

RELATED: The 15 Worst Special Effects in Blockbuster Movies

The most haunting and quasi-psychedelic effect was the V’Ger cloud itself, which appeared to be made up of various fractals in a blue palette. Rather than represent something that would appear concretely intelligible to the audience, the special effects team opted for a different look that was difficult to analyze. Instead of enjoying the experience of the effects, in this case, the audience was trying to interpret what they were seeing.

4 Good: New characters

Awkward look in the hall

Obviously, seeing the old familiar faces on the big screen for the first time was what Star trek Fans have been climbing since the series went off the air, but the movie featured some new characters that were interesting and compelling in their own right.

Captain William Decker was one of them, his handsome appeal, personable nature, and tension with Kirk contributed substantially to the narrative. Lieutenant Ilia, the Deltan navigator, was another good addition. Interesting and full of potential, it’s unfortunate that their merger with V’Ger at the climax of the film has removed them from appearing as regulars in the sequels.

3 It wasn’t good: the climax of the movie

Space kiss

Speaking of the union of Decker, Ilia, and V’Ger, the whole climax of Star Trek: The Movie It was anticlimactic, to say the least. For two and a half hours, the audience watched patiently as an immensely destructive force swept through the galaxy, and in the final moments of the films they expected something a little more exciting than a man and woman merging with a computer.

Even the reveal that V’Ger was NASA’s probe Voyager 6 reformatted by an alien race was a bit hard to swallow, just like Kirk dusted off “space dust” to see TravelerThe full name on the probe chassis.

two Good: revitalized the franchise

Star Trek The Movement Image Gene Roddenberry

The better part of Star Trek: The Movie is that it reinvigorated the franchise and gave longtime fans what they wanted to see: their heroes back in action for another adventure.

Having learned from the successes and mistakes of this film, the producers and writers released many successful Star trek aftermath; immediate successor to this movie, Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan, It is considered the best Trek movie to date. The franchise also expanded to include a host of TV shows that continued the spirit and legacy of Roddenberry’s vision, and none of that would have happened if this movie hadn’t been made.

1 It wasn’t good: rhythm

Enterprise in Star Trek The Movie

By far one of, if not the biggest drawback of Star Trek: The Movie it was his rhythm. The plot redefines the term “smoldering” as almost the entire film is spent traversing the vast expanse of V’Ger’s vast area to reach its core, with little or no action in between (unless you count a sequence time consuming and laborious wormholes).

The film is philosophical in nature and full of dialogue, which may have appealed to those interested in dramatized hypothetical polemics, but was not entirely convincing to the general audience attending the cinema.

NEXT: 10 Things That Make No Sense About Star Trek’s Mirror Universe

Harry Potter Meets Riverdale: 5 Friendships That Would Work (& 5 That Would Turn Ugly)

About the Author

By admin

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *