Given all the critical and commercial acclaim Peter Jackson’s Lord of the Rings film trilogy received, it’s easy to lose sight of just how impossible the project seemed when it was first made. Back then, Harvey Weinstein was still one of the most powerful producers in Hollywood. When he brought Jackson on board to do The Lord of the rings, the project was conceived as a two-film affair to keep expenses low.

For a long time, that was the version of The Lord of the rings that Jackson was trying to do, with completed, finished scripts for two parts that would have greatly shortened the journey from the Fellowship of the Ring to Mordor. In a recent opinion piece for Polygon, journalist Drew McWeeny recalled the moment when he was allowed to read the scripts for the two-movie version of Peter Jackson. The Lord of the rings, and how it would have differed from the trilogy we finally got to see.

RELATED: Will Viggo Mortensen Ever Come Back In A Future Lord Of The Rings Project?

“What was the two-movie version like? Most of what you love about the eventual trilogy. Philippa Boyens was listed as script editor in the document codenamed” Jamboree. “(When it all moved to New Line Cinema, the studio that eventually made the trilogy, Sinclair was gone, and Boyens was a full-fledged co-writer on the movies.) These early drafts managed to incorporate most of the series’ major incidents, but without the texture of the character that does the trilogy so special. It felt like watching the eventual movies playing back at 1.5x speed, all compressed and sped up. There were ideas that came up in an early way (Galadriel’s haunting narration of the opening of Fellowship was originally delivered in a slightly different by Frodo, example), and the original suspense took place in Emyn Muil Bluff after Sam, Frodo, and Gollum had an encounter with the Nazgul. “

What makes the trilogy of The Lord of the rings So special is that it gives each character room to breathe, speak and get excited, rather than being a tireless step from one action scene to another. It seems that this sense of calm was missing in the two-part version of the project that Peter jackson was originally attached to. According to McWeeny, the main theme of the story remained the same, but the characters became mere plot devices of a generic action blockbuster.

“The bones for the Jackson version were already in place, and that two-movie version understood that Samwise Gamgee was the hero of the whole story, the main character whose journey finally punctuates things. There were more songs in these drafts, songs road that felt taken straight from Tolkien’s text, but it was all delivered in one clip. There was no time to really enjoy the Shire, there was no room for Pippin and Merry to emerge as characters, let alone the texture of the Middle-earth. We met the elves in passing. There was a recognition of Arwen and Aragorn, but nothing else. The main character who benefited from the expansion to three films was Gollum, who went from being a plot device to a fully realized character More than anything, the two version films felt that every choice they made consisted of trying to turn them into more mainstream blockbusters at the expense of the dense story and the poetry that defines Tolkien’s work. “

Fortunately, Jackson managed to take away the rights to the project from Weinstein and found a new home with New Line Cinema, who understood the dense nature of the work Jackson was trying to adapt and encouraged him to take more time to tell the story. turning it into a trilogy. And thus was born one of the most successful film adaptations of all time. Thanks to Polygon.

Topics: Lord of the Rings


Reference-movieweb.com

By admin

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *