Snake Eyes: GI Joe Origins has arrived and is already receiving quite mixed reviews. Here’s why critics are divided on the film.

Snake Eyes: GI Joe Origins it’s here, and the reviews are pretty mixed so far, skewing negatively. The movie currently has a 40 percent Tomatometer rating on Rotten Tomatoes as of this writing, and while many are calling it the best. G.I. Joe film still, that’s not necessarily a high bar in terms of critical success. But why are the reviews of Snake Eyes so mixed?

The G.I. Joe The franchise’s past record for live-action blockbusters isn’t exactly stellar. From 2009 GI Joe: The Rise of Cobra has a dismal 34 percent on Rotten Tomatoes, and 2013 GI Joe: Retaliation it’s 29 percent even worse. Both previous films were criticized for poor writing, overly silly stories, and mediocre special effects, all of which overshadowed the fun, cartoonish adventures at their cores. The promise of a more grounded and personal story in Snake Eyes It sounded promising before release, but the critical consensus seems to be that it doesn’t do enough to make the movie great.

Related: How Much Did Snake Eyes Cost To Make Compared To Previous GI Joe Movies?

To be fair, Snake Eyes has received critical acclaim for several things. The choreography of the fight is a commonly cited high point in criticism, as are the performances of many members of the supporting cast, such as Haruka Abe and Iko Uwais. However, those good qualities are often rejected by a number of issues, critics say, such as an over-reliance on shaky camera during otherwise thrilling action sequences, and a central story that has been called predictable, cliche and mediocre. The main problem with Snake Eyes It seems that the personal journey that was supposed to make him great sadly falls short of that goal. See what the critics have to say below.

See also  Petro orders that Bolívar's sword be brought to him, after the last snub from Iván Duque

New York Times:

For a blatant action hero, Henry Golding in the title role has long ago stood up and looked uptight. The chaos is frenetic but forgettable, and the possibly inadvertent clumsiness extends from monumental dialogues such as “For 600 years, our ninjas have brought peace and stability to Japan” to a central cast villain who appears to have a side job as a dominatrix.

The coat:

Since the early days of the cartoon series (and it played out particularly well in Larry Hama’s run in the Marvel comics GI Joe), Snake Eyes and Storm Shadow have been trapped in a seemingly endless cycle of jealousy, betrayal, murder. , error. identity and revenge. His backstory is the closest GI Joe has probably been to Shakespeare, which is to say that he’s not particularly close, but pretty good for a franchise that was created specifically to sell toys to children. So it’s frustrating to watch Schwentke’s Snake Eyes movie transform that saga into a dispassionate and mediocre action movie. The drama is confusing, the action is murky, and the story can’t help but get more and more goofy until, in the end, all the attempts this movie makes to land the GI Joe series blow up. It’s not the worst movie the GI Joe series has delivered, but it’s certainly the least interesting.

The Hollywood Reporter:

It’s all a lot to cram into a movie that should have been more snappy and petty, not to mention more palpably violent. (Despite the hundreds of swords slicing through the air in this PG-13 adventure, the only blood we see is peacefully drawn, for a DNA test.) On the other hand, wishing for stronger dramatic development and punchier action can be naive when you’re watching a movie from the Transformers series producer, another throwback to the days when TV cartoons were essentially cheap commercials for new toys. .

Chicago Sun-Times:

Henry Golding is a charming and personable guy who did a real movie star performance in Crazy Rich Asians and did a stunning villain turn in Guy Ritchie’s The Gentlemen, but he’s too mellow and non-threatening a presence to play Snake Eyes, who He has spent his entire adult life searching for the man who killed his father when he was just a little Snake Eyes. We are told that this man is full of bitterness and a thirst for revenge, but he never FEELS as if he is filled with bitterness and a thirst for revenge.

See also  Books of the week: Yuval Noah Harari, Bef…

Snake Eyes GI Joe Origins Movie Review

Of course, there are several critics who question these claims. Some have praised lead actors Henry Golding and Andrew Koji, claiming their chemistry is enough to deserve a proper G.I. Joe film franchise. The range of shots Snake Eyes It is large and deeply varied, with some touting it as one of the best summer blockbusters in recent memory, and others criticizing it for being completely forgettable.

Screen Rant:

Perhaps the greatest strength of Snake Eyes is the action scenes, which are frenetic and energetic, although overuse of Schwentke’s shaky camera is sometimes frustrating as it turns the fight scenes into confusing flashes of motion with little sense. However, when the fight choreography is allowed to shine through, that’s where the Snake Eyes action really flourishes. And the action scenes arrive often enough to keep the film’s lame storyline moving forward. There are many ideas in Snake Eyes that have potential, but few actually live up to the hype.


Snake Eyes, directed by Robert Schwentke (The Divergent Series: Insurgent), is flamboyant and flamboyant, with a diabolical family plot that creates a reasonable share of real drama. The movie is also a synthetic yet exuberantly skilled hodgepodge of ninja movies, wuxia movies, yakuza movies, and international revenge movies. Fight scenes are staged with razor-sharp precision, and the entire film, shot by cinematographer Bojan Bazelli, has an immersive, night-blooming look. For a franchise movie for kids, it’s pretty good, but the main headline is this: Henry Golding needs to be seriously considered for the role of James Bond. Snake Eyes makes it clear that he has the beauty, the freshness, the glamor, the danger, the magnetism, and that essential Bond quality: the ability to telegraph the most lethal thoughts to an audience without saying a word.

Chronicle of San Francisco:

“Snake Eyes” has the makings of a good movie: a stylish director and a vivid and interesting cast of actors. But it becomes entangled in its history, with one more twist, and loses all propulsion. In the end, it’s no better than a mediocre superhero endeavor, except it’s even worse, because there was potential for more.

USA Today:

The action sequences don’t disappoint either, from night-time shooting car chases to swordfights in the rain on neon-lit Japanese rooftops. Even when Snake Eyes’ core personal story gets a bit lost in the bigger global stakes, the film has a relentless sense of style with some hints of overblown absurdity that act as a throwback to the film’s Reagan era, Saturday. morning cartoon font material

Ultimately, the critical consensus appears to be that Snake Eyes It’s about what most people expected: a relatively unspectacular summer blockbuster with solid action and a compelling cast, but one that relies too much on franchise setup and genre tropes to turn into something really cool. Still that’s better than the last two G.I. Joe films. Will Snake Eyes finally begets the G.I. Joe The cinematic universe Paramount has been waiting to build? Only time will tell.

Next: Who is Snake Eyes? Explanation of the history and history of GI Joe

Margot Robbie as Harley Quinn in The Suicide Squad

James Gunn reveals his biggest regret for Harley Quinn in the Suicide Squad

About the Author

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *